31.10.2026, 16:36

Search

Hunting Act

Wolf: Federal Councillor Rösti bypasses law and order

In future, wolves may also be shot before they have caused any damage. Pre-emptive killing is permitted as early as December – by cantonal game wardens and recreational hunters.

Editorial team Wild beim Wild · 2 November 2023

Federal Council acts contrary to the rule of law

With the hunting ordinance entering into force on 1 December 2023, the Federal Council is acting in defiance of the rule of law.

Federal Councillor Rösti and his colleagues show a lack of understanding of Species protection, of democracy and of the interplay between alpine farming, wild animals and the forest.

This massacre goes against the Bern Convention and the decision of the voters.

Arbitrary hunting ordinance without a scientific basis

The Federal Council is pushing ahead with changes to the hunting regulations that lack any wildlife-biological approach. The number of livestock killed fell by half (Grisons) and by around 80% (Glarus). It has long been known that the number of livestock killed depends neither on the number of livestock nor on the number of Wolves in the area, but primarily on whether effective herd protection measures have been implemented. And the will of the people is knowingly disregarded: in the 2020 vote on hunting, the electorate clearly rejected the pre-emptive killing of wolves.

Rösti is rapidly creating a fait accompli without any scientific foundation. This goes against the will of the people, who, in rejecting the new hunting act, clearly spoke out in favour of the wolf.

Wolves save more sheep than they kill

Before the wolf appeared, 10,000 sheep died every year on alpine pastures because they fell to their deaths unsupervised, strayed, or froze or starved in bad weather. Since the wolf's arrival and the shepherding that is now actually required, only 3,000 sheep die during the alpine grazing season.

Sharp criticism from the cantons

On 6 September, the Conference of the Cantons for Forests, Wildlife and Landscape described the hunting ordinance, now adopted by the Federal Council largely unchanged, as arbitrary in substance, one-sided and at odds with scientific considerations of species protection.

Today around 300 wolves live in Switzerland, in 32 packs. All but 12 of those packs are to be wiped out and the population shot down by 70 per cent, pre-emptively, without a single one of these wolves ever having killed livestock such as sheep or cattle.

Graphic “Facts instead of polemics”: howling wolf and recreational hunter with dog, number of victims since 2000: 0 versus 65 deaths

Geneva model has shown since 1974 that humans and wild animals can coexist without recreational hunting .

Dossier: Wolf in Switzerland: facts, politics and the limits of hunting

Further articles

More on the subject of recreational hunting: What the research says about this is shown by Hunting fact-checked: the state of research.

The position of IG Wild beim Wild: IG Wild beim Wild rejects recreational hunting. Our model is the canton of Geneva, which has managed without recreational hunting since 1974: without hunting seasons, without hunting dogs, without driven hunts, without high seats, without the animal cruelty and crime that go hand in hand with hunting season elsewhere. What has worked there for over fifty years disproves every position paper by JagdSchweiz. An association that bases its policy on claims it refutes in its own documents is not a professional organisation, but a factory for misinformation.

Wild animals need a voice

Once a week: research, petitions and background information on recreational hunting. Free of charge and can be unsubscribed from at any time.

All articles are written by IG Wild beim Wild as well as by external co-authors. Research, structuring and editorial processes may be supported by AI-assisted tools.

Support our work

With your donation you help protect animals and give their voice a hearing.

Donate now →