Fox Switzerland: Most Hunted Predator Without Lobby

In Switzerland, approximately 19’000 red foxes are shot annually during low hunting season. Most of them end up in the trash. For foxes in Switzerland, there are no shooting plans, no quotas and no scientifically recognized need for regulation. They are hunted year-round – through low hunting, pass hunting, den hunting and with special permits during closed season. According to the Animal Welfare Act (Art. 26 TSchG), a "reasonable justification" must exist for killing an animal. For fox hunting, none exists that withstands scientific scrutiny.

What a contradiction: The animal that plays the most important role in Switzerland as a natural mouse hunter, carrion recycler and disease regulator is classified as "vermin" and serves recreational hunters as a living target. At least 18 wildlife biology studies over more than 30 years consistently prove: Fox hunting does not regulate populations, it destabilizes them. It is not suitable for disease control – on the contrary. In Luxembourg, fox hunting has been banned since 2015: populations have remained stable, the infection rate with fox tapeworm has dropped from 40 to under 10 percent. In Geneva Canton, there has been no militia hunting for over 50 years – without "fox explosion", without epidemics, without chaos. JagdSchweiz itself wrote in 2011: "Wildlife populations basically regulate themselves – even in our cultural landscape – on their own."

This dossier compiles the most important facts about the fox in Switzerland: its ecological role as health police and mouse regulator, the scientific refutation of hunting arguments, the political mechanisms that protect its senseless persecution – and the question of why a practice that is demonstrably counterproductive continues in the 21st century. Those who want to delve deeper will find the most comprehensive material base in our Dossier on Hunting in Switzerland.

What to expect here

Biology and lifestyle: Who the red fox is, how it lives, why it colonizes all habitats in Switzerland as a cultural follower and adaptation artist.
Ecological significance: Why the fox accomplishes more for ecosystems as a mouse regulator, carcass recycler and health police than any hobby hunter.
Compensatory reproduction: The scientific mechanism that explains why fox hunting leads to more foxes – and why Luxembourg, Geneva and the National Park prove this.
Fox tapeworm, rabies, mange: How the recreational hunting lobby instrumentalizes disease fears – and what the data actually show.
Threats: Recreational hunting, den hunting, night hunting, mistaken shootings, road traffic and the systematic dehumanization of a fascinating predator.
Luxembourg and Geneva: The success models that refute the entire hunting narrative.
Politics and lobby: How JagdSchweiz defends fox hunting – and why the arguments don't hold.
"Did you know?" – 25 facts about foxes that refute the hunting narrative.
Alternatives: What works instead.
What would need to change: Concrete political demands.
Argumentation: Answers to the most common claims by the recreational hunting lobby about foxes.
Quick links: All relevant articles, studies and dossiers.

Biology and lifestyle: Europe's most adaptable predator

The red fox (Vulpes vulpes) belongs to the dog family (Canidae) and is the most widely distributed terrestrial carnivore on Earth. In Switzerland, it is the only native fox species. Adult animals reach a body length of 60 to 90 centimeters, a tail length (brush) of around 40 centimeters and a weight of 5 to 8 kilograms. The characteristic reddish-brown coat color varies by region and season, the tail tip is white. The upright, triangular ears can be turned by the fox in almost all directions, allowing precise localization of sounds.

Foxes are solitary animals with a flexible social system. In rural areas, a fox claims a territory of 100 to 350 hectares (in the Swiss Jura), in cities like Zurich only around 30 hectares. The territories are marked with urine and feces and defended against conspecifics. This territorial system is a natural regulatory mechanism: vacated living space is quickly reoccupied by other foxes, not through reproduction, but through immigration.

The mating season (rutting period) falls in the winter months December to March. The vixen is receptive for only two to three days in January or February. After a gestation period of around 50 to 63 days, she gives birth to an average of four to six cubs. In stable, non-hunted populations, only the highest-ranking vixen of the family group reproduces – "birth control instead of mass misery," as biologist Erik Zimen described this phenomenon. When the social structure is destroyed by hunting, nearly all vixens reproduce, litter sizes increase, and the population compensates for losses in the shortest time.

The fox is a pronounced food opportunist. Its diet includes field mice (main food source, around 80 percent), fruit and berries, worms, insects, carrion, waste and occasionally birds or rabbits. The daily nutritional requirement corresponds to approximately 15 to 20 mice. This dietary breadth makes it one of the most important natural regulators of mouse and rodent populations – with direct positive impacts on agriculture and health.

The natural life expectancy of a fox is up to eight years. In heavily hunted areas, 95 percent of all foxes do not live beyond four years. In the Swiss National Park, where the fox is fully protected, the population has regulated itself stably for decades, none of its prey species have gone extinct, and there are neither epidemics nor 'population explosions'.

More on this: Animal Cruelty: Fox Massacre in Switzerland and End Fox Hunting

Ecology: Health Police, Mouse Hunter and Carrion Processor

The fox is an ecological keystone species. Its functions in the ecosystem are diverse, measurable and cannot be replaced by any hobby hunting:

As a mouse regulator the fox keeps populations of field mice, voles and other small mammals in check. A single fox eats several thousand mice annually. This has direct impacts on agriculture (fewer crop losses from mouse damage), on forestry (less root damage to young trees) and on human health: Fewer mice means fewer ticks, less borreliosis, less hantavirus. Current research shows that the fox is one of our most valuable allies in the fight against borreliosis.

As a carrion processor the fox removes animal carcasses and thereby prevents the spread of diseases. This role as 'health police' is often romanticized in hunting literature, but contradicted in hunting practice: Those who shoot foxes eliminate precisely those animals that perform this function.

As a seed disperser the fox carries seeds of berries and fruits to new areas through its droppings and thereby promotes plant diversity. This function is also ecologically documented and cannot be replaced by any hunting method.

The hobby hunting lobby argues that the fox must be 'regulated' to protect ground-nesting birds and hares. The data fundamentally refute this: In Germany, around 10 million foxes were shot in ten years – and hare populations declined by half in the same period, pheasant populations by 75 percent, partridges almost completely disappeared. The decline of these species is due to habitat destruction through intensive agriculture – not the fox. Luxembourg's Environment Minister stated clearly: 'There is no scientific evidence that the fox hunting ban is responsible for the decline of certain bird species.'

More on this: Fox Hunting Without Facts: How JagdSchweiz Invents Problems and Hunting and Biodiversity: Does Hunting Really Protect Nature?

Compensatory Reproduction: Why Fox Hunting Leads to More Foxes

The central scientific argument against fox hunting is compensatory reproductive dynamics. This is not an isolated finding, but one of the best-documented phenomena in population biology. At least 18 wildlife biology studies over more than 30 years consistently prove: fox hunting does not regulate.

The mechanism is clear: When foxes are decimated by recreational hunting, the population responds with increased birth rates. In stable, unhunted populations, only the highest-ranking vixen reproduces, and litter sizes are small. As soon as the social structure is torn apart by hunting, nearly all vixens reproduce, litter sizes increase three- to fourfold, and foxes from adjacent areas migrate into the vacated territories. Studies prove: Even when three-quarters of a population is shot, the same number of animals is present again the following year.

Robert Brunold, president of the cantonal licensed hunters' association of Graubünden, stated openly: "The hunting season isn't necessary, but it's justified. One could also ask whether it makes sense to collect berries and mushrooms in the forest!" Peter Juesy, former hunting inspector of the Canton of Bern, put it more soberly: "From a wildlife biology perspective, fox hunting makes no sense; the population cannot be regulated this way."

What practical experience confirms:

In the Swiss National Park foxes have not been hunted for over 100 years. The population is stable. None of its prey species has gone extinct. There is no "fox explosion."

In Canton Geneva there has been no militia hunting since 1974. Here too, no "fox explosion," no epidemics, but instead growing biodiversity and 30,000 overwintering waterfowl.

In Luxembourg fox hunting has been banned since 2015. Wildlife camera counts show a stable, consistent population. The horror scenarios predicted by the Luxembourg hunting association have not materialized.

In German national parks (Bavarian Forest, Berchtesgaden, among others) fox hunting has been discontinued or severely restricted – with consistently positive results.

More on this: Why recreational hunting fails as population control and Luxembourg extends fox hunting ban

Fox tapeworm, rabies, mange: How fear keeps fox hunting alive

The recreational hunting lobby changes its justification arguments as soon as one is scientifically refuted. First it was rabies, then fox tapeworm, then mange, then Lyme disease. The hunting practice remains the same – only the label changes.

Rabies: Terrestrial rabies has been considered eradicated in Switzerland since 1998. It was not defeated by shooting, but by vaccine baits. The Swiss Rabies Center had already concluded: A hunting reduction of fox populations is "obviously not possible and hunting for rabies control is even counterproductive." The massive hunting had spread the disease instead of containing it – because it intensified migration movements and destroyed the social structure. The argument of "rabies control" disappeared, fox hunting remained.

Fox tapeworm: The claim "fewer foxes = less fox tapeworm = less risk" sounds logical, but has been refuted. A four-year French study (2017) showed: In areas with intensive hunting, the infection rate of foxes rose from 40 to 55-75 percent. In the hunting-free control area, it remained constant. In Luxembourg, the infection rate dropped from 40 to under 10 percent after the fox hunting ban. Hunting destabilizes territorial structures, increases migration movements, and thus promotes the spread of the parasite. Fewer than 30 people contract fox tapeworm annually in Switzerland – far fewer than are harmed in hunting accidents. Typically, hobby hunters themselves are the ones who get infected, through handling shot animals.

Mange: Fox mange occurs equally in hunted and unhunted populations. Hunting pressure and the associated stress weaken the animals' immune systems and increase susceptibility to diseases. The claim that fox hunting protects against mange is not epidemiologically proven.

Lyme disease: Here the argument is completely reversed: Fewer foxes mean more mice, more mice mean more ticks, more ticks mean more Lyme disease and more hantavirus. In Germany, up to 2,000 people contract hantavirus annually – around 800 percent more than those affected by fox tapeworm. Those who shoot foxes harm public health.

More on this: Hunting and Wildlife Diseases and Small Game Hunting and Wildlife Diseases

Threats: A Life Under Permanent Fire

The fox is not protected in Switzerland. It is huntable, hunted practically year-round, and its killing is subject to no official planning. This makes it fair game – an animal in a legal no-man's land.

Small game hunting: During the day, foxes are shot in most cantons as part of small game hunting. There are no quotas and no officially set kill numbers. The animals serve as living targets.

Pass hunting and night hunting: At night, hobby hunters sit at baiting stations in and around forests waiting for 'predatory game' that cantonal ordinances explicitly permit despite supposed night hunting bans. Whether Zurich, Graubünden, Solothurn or Aargau: The pattern repeats itself. Officially, the night hunting ban applies in forests, but exceptions for 'predatory game' systematically undermine it.

Den hunting: One of the cruelest hunting methods of all. Trained dogs are sent into fox and badger dens. The trapped animals suffer mortal terror, are bitten and driven. According to Article 4 of the Animal Welfare Act, it is prohibited to set dogs on other animals. Nevertheless, exactly this is legalized and practiced thousands of times in fox hunting. 64 percent of the Swiss population support a ban on den hunting.

Misidentification shootings: Foxes are regularly mistaken for protected species – particularly wildcats, which are spreading again in Switzerland. The consequences for hobby hunters are minimal.

Road traffic: Approximately 7,000 foxes fall victim to traffic annually. Hunting pressure increases migration movements and drives foxes into unfamiliar territories – including across roads.

Disposal instead of utilization: Most killed foxes are disposed of as waste. They are not eaten, their fur is usually not used. The JagdSchweiz position paper from 2025 treats foxes as 'ownerless public property' and as raw material with fluctuating fur prices. Not as sentient individuals.

More on this: Foxes in Permanent Mortal Terror Due to Hunting and Ban on Senseless Fox Hunting is Overdue

Luxembourg and Geneva: The Success Models That Refute the Hunting Narrative

Luxembourg and the Canton of Geneva provide irrefutable practical evidence that fox hunting is unnecessary.

Luxembourg: Since April 1, 2015, fox hunting has been banned, the fox was removed from the list of huntable species. Even after the change of government in 2023 (the Greens were voted out of the coalition), the ban was maintained. The new Environment Minister Serge Willmes (CSV) confirmed: The data gives no reason to lift the fox hunting ban. The results after more than ten years are clear: No increase in fox population (stable according to wildlife camera monitoring), no decline in hares or pheasants, no problems with rabies or fox tapeworm. On the contrary: The infection rate with fox tapeworm dropped from around 40 percent (2014, under hunting) to under 10 percent (2023, without hunting). With this, Luxembourg has empirically refuted the hunting lobby's main argument.

Canton of Geneva: Since 1974, there has been no militia hunting. Wildlife management is handled by professional game wardens. Foxes are not hunted. Species diversity has increased, with birdlife developing from a few hundred to 30,000 overwintering waterfowl. The costs for professional wildlife management amount to around one million francs per year – equivalent to one cup of coffee per inhabitant.

National Parks: In the Swiss National Park, foxes have not been hunted for over 100 years. The population is stable. German national parks (Bavarian Forest, Berchtesgaden) show the same pattern: cessation of fox hunting without negative consequences.

The conclusion is uncomfortably clear: A permanent fox hunting ban is possible, does not lead to chaos, and undermines the foundation of the hobby hunting lobby's fear-mongering arguments. What has been lived practice in Luxembourg, Geneva and numerous national parks for years can become reality throughout Switzerland.

More on this: Geneva and the Hunting Ban and How Switzerland Continues to Shoot Foxes at Night and What Geneva Has Long Done Better

Politics and Lobbying: How JagdSchweiz Defends Fox Hunting

On November 27, 2025, JagdSchweiz published a position paper on fox hunting. The tenor: Fox hunting is "sensible and useful" and must be "absolutely maintained." Criticism from nature and animal protection organizations is dismissed as emotional and lacking facts. A look at the paper's structure reveals the pattern:

Foxes are treated as "ownerless public property" and as raw material with fluctuating fur prices. What matters is hunting rights, hunting quotas and markets – not the animal as a sentient individual. The position paper systematically ignores experiences from Luxembourg, Geneva and fox-hunting-free national parks. It paints dramatic scenarios (population explosion, disease risk, species loss) that have not occurred in any hunting-free area. And it conceals official figures on hunting practices: In the canton of Graubünden, around 1,000 annual charges and fines against hobby hunters document the extent of technical errors and irregular shots. Of 7,079 foxes killed in the 2022/23 hunting season, hobby hunters could not even determine whether they had shot a vixen or a male fox.

The position paper directly contradicts their own earlier statement: JagdSchweiz publicly wrote on August 29, 2011: "Wildlife populations basically regulate themselves – even in our cultural landscape – on their own." Thus the umbrella organization of Swiss hobby hunters has dismantled their own core argument in writing.

A court in Bellinzona has legally confirmed that criticism of a culture of violence in JagdSchweiz's environment cannot be considered defamation. The fox hunting narrative is a prime example of how lobby interests generate political resistance to facts.

More on this: Fox Hunting Without Facts: How JagdSchweiz Invents Problems and How Hunting Associations Influence Politics and the Public

"Did You Know?" – 25 Facts About Foxes That Refute the Hunting Narrative

Annually, around 19,000 foxes are shot during low hunting season in Switzerland. Most end up in the garbage.
For fox hunting in Switzerland, there is no shooting plan, no quotas, and no scientifically recognized reason for regulation.
At least 18 wildlife biology studies over more than 30 years consistently prove: Fox hunting does not regulate and is not suitable for disease control.
JagdSchweiz itself wrote in 2011: "Wildlife populations basically regulate themselves – even in our cultural landscape – on their own."
In Luxembourg, fox hunting has been banned since 2015. Populations are stable, infestation rates with fox tapeworm dropped from 40 to under 10 percent.
In the canton of Geneva, there has been no militia hunting since 1974 – without "fox explosion," without epidemics, with increasing biodiversity.
In the Swiss National Park, foxes have not been hunted for over 100 years. The population is stable, none of its prey species has gone extinct.
In heavily hunted populations, nearly all vixens reproduce and litter sizes increase three- to fourfold – compensatory reproduction produces more foxes, not fewer.
Terrestrial rabies was not defeated in Switzerland through shooting but through vaccine baits. The rabies control center described fox hunting for rabies control as 'counterproductive'.
A French study showed: Intensive hunting increased the fox tapeworm infection rate to 55 to 75 percent – in the hunting-free control area it remained at 40 percent.
A single fox eats several thousand mice annually. Fewer foxes means more mice, more ticks, more Lyme disease and more hantavirus.
In Germany, up to 2,000 people fall ill with hantavirus annually – around 800 percent more than with fox tapeworm.
Foxes feed approximately 80 percent on mice. The hunting justification 'protection of hares' is factually wrong, as foxes practically never catch healthy hares.
In Germany, around 10 million foxes were shot in ten years – and hare populations declined by half during the same period.
64 percent of the Swiss population supports a ban on den hunting. Only 21 percent want it to continue.
Of 7,079 foxes killed in the 2022/23 hunting season, hobby hunters could not determine whether they had shot a vixen or a male.
Den hunting sets aggressive dogs on foxes and badgers in their burrows – according to animal protection law, it is prohibited to set dogs on other animals.
Hobby hunters receive special permits in many cantons to kill foxes even during the closed season (June 16 to August 31) – declared as 'management hunting'.
Approximately 7,000 foxes fall victim to road traffic in Switzerland annually. Hunting pressure increases migration movements and thus accident risk.
The nationwide fox population is estimated at over 100,000 animals – without any shooting plan, nearly one-fifth is shot every year.
Luxembourg confirmed its fox hunting ban explicitly in 2024 – even under a new, conservative government.
The fox serves in the ecosystem as a mouse regulator, carrion recycler and seed disperser – functions that no hobby hunter can replace.
In the canton of Geneva, professional wildlife management costs around one million francs per year – one cup of coffee per resident.
Urban foxes in Zurich, Basel, Lausanne and other cities live peacefully alongside humans. Conflicts arise almost exclusively through feeding and littering.
A court in Bellinzona has legally confirmed that criticism of a culture of violence in the environment of JagdSchweiz cannot be considered defamation.

Alternatives: What works instead

Fox hunting is not only unnecessary – it is counterproductive. What works instead is tested and proven:

Allow natural self-regulation: Fox populations regulate themselves through food supply, territoriality, diseases and social mechanisms. In stable populations, only the highest-ranking vixen reproduces. Luxembourg, Geneva and the National Park have proven this for years and decades.

Deworming baits instead of shooting: Controlling fox tapeworm demonstrably works better through deworming baits (praziquantel) than through hunting. This method specifically reduces infection rates without destroying territorial structures and triggering migration movements.

Professional game wardens instead of armed militia: Following the Geneva model, state-employed specialists take over the few necessary interventions – transparently, in accordance with animal welfare, according to ecological criteria, without trophy logic and without gratification of bloodlust.

Hygiene and prevention: Conflicts with urban foxes can be better resolved through hygiene measures (closed garbage containers, no feeding, protected chicken coops) than through shooting, which immediately results in vacant territories being reoccupied.

Habitat protection and connectivity: Wildlife corridors and connected green spaces enable stable territorial structures and reduce conflicts with road traffic.

Monitoring by independent expert agencies: Population surveys must be separated from the hobby hunting lobby. Those who count, hunt and lobby politically cannot simultaneously deliver objective data.

More information: Alternatives to hobby hunting and The Wildlife Warden Model – professional wildlife management with code of ethics

What would need to change

Immediate ban on fox hunting in Switzerland: There is no reasonable justification for the mass killing of foxes. Luxembourg, Geneva and the National Park prove that a ban works. Fox hunting is a clear violation of Art. 26 TSchG. Model motion: Template texts for hunting-critical motions
Immediate ban on den hunting: Den hunting is not justifiable under animal welfare law, is rejected by the majority of the population and is scientifically pointless. It must be banned under federal law.
Ban on night hunting and special permits for foxes: The cantonal exceptions that enable fox hunting during the closed season and at night must be abolished. Foxes must not remain animals in a legal no-man's-land.
Separation of enforcement, population surveys and interest representation: Population surveys and monitoring of fox populations must not be conducted by hobby hunting associations that have an economic interest in continuing the hunt.
Use of deworming baits instead of shooting: Control of fox tapeworm must be switched to scientifically proven methods (Praziquantel baits), not to hunting practices that demonstrably exacerbate the problem.
Gradual transition to professional wildlife warden structures: Following the Geneva model, with cantonal pilot projects, transparent cost calculations and scientific evaluation.

Arguments

«Without fox hunting, populations will explode.» In Luxembourg, Geneva and the Swiss National Park there is no fox hunting – and nowhere is there a «population explosion». Fox populations regulate themselves through food supply, territoriality and social mechanisms. Hunting destroys these mechanisms and triggers compensatory reproduction. The argument is not only false, but describes exactly the opposite of biological reality: More fox hunting produces more foxes.

«Fox hunting protects against fox tapeworm.» The infection rate in Luxembourg fell from 40 to under 10 percent after the hunting ban. A French study showed that intensive hunting increases the infection rate. Hunting destabilizes territorial structures and intensifies migration movements – exactly what promotes the spread of the parasite. Deworming baits are effective, not shotgun pellets.

«The fox is to blame for the decline of field hares and ground-nesting birds.» In Germany, around 10 million foxes were shot over ten years – field hares declined by half, pheasants by 75 percent, partridges almost disappeared. Luxembourg's Environment Minister confirmed: «There is no scientific evidence that the fox hunting ban is responsible for the decline of bird species.» The cause is habitat loss through intensive agriculture, not the fox. The fox as scapegoat relieves agricultural policy and legitimizes hobby hunting.

«Den hunting is necessary to control fox populations.» Den baiting is the cruelest hunting method, rejected by 64 percent of the population, problematic under animal welfare law (setting dogs on other animals is prohibited) and demonstrably regulates nothing. It serves the gratification of hobby hunters, not wildlife management.

«Urban foxes are a problem and must be hunted.» Urban foxes are cultural followers that have adapted to human habitats. Conflicts arise from feeding and littering, not from the fox. Hunting in cities is impractical, dangerous and ineffective because vacant territories are immediately reoccupied. The solution lies in hygiene, prevention and information – not in weapons.

«The fox is a pest and belongs to the huntable species.» The fox is an ecological keystone actor: mouse regulator, carrion processor, seed disperser and the most important natural antagonist of rodent populations. The term «pest» is a hunting projection. In hunting parlance it is called «vermin» – which crystal clearly demonstrates the primitive attitude of hobby hunters toward wildlife.

Quick links

Articles on Wild beim Wild:

Related dossiers:

Our mission

Fox hunting is the most thoroughly refuted hunting practice in Europe. No other wild animal is killed so massively, systematically dehumanized and stubbornly defended with arguments that are empirically refuted in every fox-hunting-free area of the world. The fox is not a pest. It is an ecological keystone actor, a fascinating cultural follower and a sentient individual with family structures, social behavior and capacity for suffering.

IG Wild beim Wild documents this reality – with numbers, studies, case reports and political analyses. We do this because 19,000 foxes per year in Switzerland have no voice. And because a practice that is scientifically refuted, questionable under animal welfare law and rejected by a majority of society cannot be legitimized by tradition or lobby pressure. This dossier is continuously updated when new studies, numbers or political developments require it.

More on the topic of hobby hunting: In our hunting dossier we bundle fact checks, analyses and background reports.