07.10.2026, 17:25

Search

Crime & Hunting

Arjeplog: Norwegian Dies During Recreational Hunt, Hunting Companion Under Suspicion

Sweden's public prosecutor initially investigated for murder, has since released the suspect, and is now examining whether he acted negligently.

Editorial Team Wild beim Wild — 7 October 2026
Audio for this article

Silence After the Shot

0:00 -0:00
All songs

In the municipality of Arjeplog in Norrbotten, a man was killed during a hunt on Thursday, 1 October 2026. According to initial police reports, he was shot. According to SVT, the men had been bird hunting together. The deceased and the suspect are both from Norway, both around 65 years old, and belonged to the same hunting group.

What the public prosecutor has announced

The investigation initially proceeded on suspicion of murder, alternatively gross negligent homicide. The hunting companion was arrested on the evening of the incident. On 2 October, following initial questioning, public prosecutor Moa Ejnestrand narrowed the charge to gross negligent homicide. Nothing indicated an intentional killing.

On 3 October, the public prosecutor released the man. The grounds were not sufficient for pre-trial detention, but suspicion against him remains. Speaking to SVT, Ejnestrand said everything pointed to an accident. What now needs to be clarified is whether the man acted negligently or with gross negligence. An autopsy is planned, along with examinations of the weapons and a dog-tracking device. The case is being handled by Luleå District Court under case number B 2999-26.

Defence lawyer Mattias Jaldeby told SVT Norrbotten that his client denies having committed any crime and was able to clearly describe the sequence of events. According to the defence, a misunderstanding regarding hunting instructions led to someone standing in the wrong place.

Two Fatal Incidents Within Days

Three days after the death in Arjeplog, on 4 October, near Halden on the Norwegian-Swedish border, two recreational hunters from a hunting group were shot dead. There, a former group member admitted to the shots. The cases differ in terms of the current state of investigation: in Arjeplog, the public prosecutor sees no indication of intentional killing.

Editorial assessment

Whether a misunderstanding over hunting instructions, a stray shot, or some other sequence of events led to the death in Arjeplog is something the investigation must clarify. The defence's explanation has not yet been confirmed. However, the case raises a fundamental question: how reliably do armed hunting groups stick to their safety arrangements, when even a wrong position can prove fatal?

Other cases documented by Wild beim Wild involve mistaken identification of animals or people. They do not prove what happened in Arjeplog, but they do show how prone the use of hunting weapons is to error:

Wild beim Wild collects further cases under the keyword Hunting accidents.

More on the subject of recreational hunting: In the dossier Poaching and hunting crime in Switzerland we document cases, legal questions and recurring patterns. The scientific evidence is presented in the overview Studies on the Effects of Recreational Hunting.

The position of IG Wild beim Wild: IG Wild beim Wild rejects recreational hunting. Our model is the canton of Geneva, which has managed without recreational hunting since 1974: without hunting seasons, without hunting dogs, without driven hunts, without high seats, without the animal cruelty and crime that go hand in hand with hunting season elsewhere. What has worked there for over fifty years disproves every position paper by JagdSchweiz. An association that bases its policy on claims it refutes in its own documents is not a professional organisation, but a factory for misinformation.

All articles are written by IG Wild beim Wild as well as by external co-authors. Research, structuring and editorial processes may be supported by AI-assisted tools.

Support our work

With your donation you help protect animals and give their voice a hearing.

Donate now →