25.10.2026, 11:44

Search

Petition: Electric netting must not be a death trap for wild animals

According to a cantonal survey by the Swiss Animal Protection STS in 2020, an estimated 3,000 to 4,500 wild animals die in fences in Switzerland every year. The number of injured animals is likely to be three to four times higher, according to the STS. More than 70 per cent of the recorded deaths were attributable to electric netting, according to the STS information sheet.

The problem persists. According to a Nau.ch report of 17 October 2026, 73 cases of wild animals caught in fences have already been recorded in Grisons this year, mainly roe deer and red deer, but also chamois, foxes and hares. The type of fence involved is not systematically recorded there. In the canton of Schwyz, according to Nau.ch, 53 wild animals died in fences between 2015 and 2018, around 65 per cent of them in Flexinet netting.

Why electric netting is so dangerous

Once a wild animal has become caught in electric netting, it is often unable to free itself. Attempts to break free can pull the mesh ever tighter around the legs and neck. With electrified nets, repeated electric shocks are added to this. Without timely help, the animal faces severe injuries and an agonising death.

For hedgehogs, the situation is particularly precarious. When they come across an unfamiliar obstacle, they often bite into it. If they happen to bite a live wire, the electric shock can trigger lockjaw: the hedgehog can no longer let go and usually dies of circulatory failure. According to experience at a hedgehog rescue centre, even animals that are freed alive are often so badly injured that they can no longer be saved.

Orange-red nets are poorly visible to roe deer and other ungulates. Ungulates see with only two types of cone and can barely distinguish orange and red from the green of a meadow, whereas they perceive blue well. The IG Wild beim Wild already pointed this out in 2023 with the petition «Stop the sale of pasture nets that endanger animals» pointed out. The herd protection advisory service of Agridea also states that orange nets are poorly visible to livestock and wild animals, and recommends blue-and-white fluttering tape.

Nets that are left standing after use, are poorly tensioned or no longer carry current are particularly dangerous. While in use, electric pasture nets must therefore be properly live, so that animals recoil at first contact. For animals that have already become entangled, however, the electric shocks mean additional suffering.

Strand fences: the safer alternative

Fences made of several tensioned strands are considerably less dangerous for wild animals than nets. There are no meshes in which legs, necks or antlers can become entangled. If they are properly erected and maintained, accidents at such fences are rare. Sheep keepers who use strand fences consider the protection of their flocks to be good.

For a polywire fence to protect against the wolf as well, it needs at least four strands, a height of at least 90 cm, a maximum of 25 cm between the strands, a bottom strand no more than 20 cm above the ground and a voltage of at least 3,000 volts. The strands can be adjusted in height. If young lambs are on the pasture, the bottom strand can be temporarily lowered slightly without endangering small animals such as hedgehogs or amphibians. Even a polywire fence, however, must be checked daily, kept taut and live, and dismantled again after use. Loose strands or strands lying on the ground also become a trap.

The rules exist; enforcement is what matters

The basis is the Swiss federal Animal Welfare Act and the Animal Welfare Ordinance. In its Pasture Fence Information Sheet, the Grisons Office for Food Safety and Animal Health states that flexible pasture nets must be removed "immediately, but at the latest within 5 days after use", including on rotational pastures, and that fences must be checked daily. In the case of serious violations, it cites sanctions affecting direct payments. Thurgau obliges owners to remove unused fences that pose a risk of injury to wild animals. The cantonal rules mentioned vary in how specific they are. What matters is that removal obligations and inspection requirements are also checked and consistently enforced on remote pastures.

Herd protection yes, death traps no

IG Wild beim Wild supports herd protection. This requires binding rules so that protective measures for livestock do not become a trap for wild animals. As Felix Hahn of the agricultural advisory centre Agridea puts it: "Fundamentally, herd protection is also wildlife protection".

Our demands

  • Removal obligation: A binding removal obligation must be introduced for the whole of Switzerland: pasture nets must be dismantled completely immediately after the end of their respective use, and at the latest within five days. This also applies after a change of pasture. Other mobile pasture fences must be removed as soon as they are no longer needed, at the latest at the end of the respective grazing season.
  • Daily inspection: Pasture nets and strand fences in use must be checked daily along their entire length and any defects repaired immediately.
  • Strand fences instead of pasture nets: Wherever possible, polywire fences should be used instead of electric netting. They must meet the basic protection standard: at least four strands, at least 90 cm high, a maximum of 25 cm between strands, the bottom strand no more than 20 cm above the ground, and at least 3,000 volts. This keeps the wolf out and lets small animals pass. For young lambs, the bottom strand may be temporarily lowered, provided hedgehogs, amphibians and other small animals can still pass.
  • Enforcement: The cantons regularly check compliance with the fencing rules and enforce them consistently.
  • Reporting obligation and statistics: Wild animals that are injured or die in fences must be reported. The cantons publish annual statistics broken down by animal species and fence type.
  • Funding: Herd protection subsidies should be tied to the professional and wildlife-friendly construction of the fences that receive funding. Breaches of binding fencing requirements should be taken into account in direct payments. What is required are fences that are clearly visible to wild animals, i.e. blue-and-white or with blue-and-white flutter tape rather than orange or red, correctly tensioned and reliably live in the case of electric systems, as well as sufficiently wide fence-free wildlife passages between fenced areas.
  • Retail: Retailers should end the sale of orange and red pasture nets and offer clearly visible blue-and-white nets and flutter tape instead. At the point of sale, they should provide information on proper use, daily inspection and removal, and take back old nets.

Anyone who finds an entangled wild animal should immediately inform the wildlife wardens or the police. Background information and current figures can be found in the article “Fences as animal traps: 73 wild animals entangled in Grisons”. For members of cantonal parliaments we have prepared a template text for animal-welfare-compliant fencing and pasture net requirements.

The petition is addressed to: Cantonal agriculture, veterinary and hunting authorities, the Federal Office for Agriculture (FOAG), the Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office (FSVO), and retailers of pasture fencing material in Switzerland

Dear Sir or Madam at the cantonal agriculture, veterinary and hunting authorities
Dear officials at the Federal Office for Agriculture and the Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office
Dear retailers of pasture fencing material

I am writing to you because every year in Switzerland thousands of wild animals die in fences, most of them in pasture nets.

According to a 2020 survey of the cantons by the Swiss Animal Protection STS, an estimated 3,000 to 4,500 wild animals die in fences in Switzerland every year. According to STS, the number of injured animals is probably three to four times higher. Over 70 per cent of the recorded deaths were caused by pasture nets. According to a report by Nau.ch of 17 October 2026, 73 cases of wild animals becoming entangled in fences have already been registered in Grisons this year.

Once a wild animal has become entangled in a pasture net, it often cannot free itself. Attempts to break free can cause the mesh to tighten ever more closely around its legs and neck. With electrified nets, repeated electric shocks are added to the ordeal. Without timely help, the animal faces severe injuries and an agonising death. While in use, electric pasture nets must be properly live so that animals recoil on first contact. For animals that are already entangled, however, the shocks mean additional suffering.

I support herd protection. However, binding rules are needed so that protective measures for livestock do not become a trap for wild animals. Some cantons, such as Grisons and Thurgau, already have specific requirements. These must apply across Switzerland and be consistently enforced.

I call for the following binding requirements and measures:

A binding obligation to dismantle must be introduced for the whole of Switzerland: pasture nets must be completely removed immediately after the end of their use, and no later than five days afterwards. This also applies after a change of pasture. Other mobile pasture fences must be removed as soon as they are no longer needed, and at the latest at the end of the respective grazing season.

Pasture nets and strand fences in use must be checked daily along their entire length and any defects repaired immediately.

Wherever possible, polywire fences should be used instead of electric netting. They must meet the basic protection standard: at least four strands, at least 90 cm high, a maximum of 25 cm between strands, the bottom strand no more than 20 cm above the ground, and at least 3,000 volts. This keeps the wolf out and lets small animals pass. For young lambs, the bottom strand may be temporarily lowered, provided hedgehogs, amphibians and other small animals can still pass.

The cantons should regularly monitor compliance with the fencing requirements and enforce them consistently.

Wild animals that are injured or die in fences must be reported. The cantons should publish annual statistics broken down by animal species and fence type.

Herd protection contributions must be tied to the professional and wildlife-friendly construction of the subsidised fences. Breaches of binding fencing requirements should be taken into account in direct payments. What is required are fences that are clearly visible to wild animals, i.e. blue-and-white or fitted with blue-and-white flutter tape rather than orange or red, properly tensioned and, in the case of electric systems, reliably live, as well as sufficiently wide fence-free passages for wild animals between enclosed areas.

Retailers of pasture fencing materials should stop selling orange and red pasture nets and instead offer clearly visible blue-and-white nets and flutter tape. At the point of sale, they should provide information on correct use, daily inspection and dismantling, and take back old nets.

Yours sincerely

260 of 5,000 signatures

Add your voice now

Your signature counts.

I signed because...

  • «Every life counts.»

    Ronny S. · 25.10.2026

  • «Our cultural landscape is a complex ecosystem in which wild animals are an indispensable part of our natural heritage. Unsecured pasture nets must no longer become invisible death traps for species that already suffer from habitat loss. Modern agriculture must combine livestock protection and species protection holistically, in order to preserve our biodiversity.»

    Elena F. · 25.10.2026

  • «For safety reasons, I want these fences banned, because animals are being killed by them.»

    Silvia M. · 25.10.2026

  • «Animals already suffer more than enough because of humans»

    Natalia R. · 25.10.2026

  • «Because I don't want even more animals to die unnecessarily.»

    Sandra W. · 25.10.2026

  • «to save wild animals and spare them a cruel death!»

    Birgit F. · 25.10.2026

  • «Animals already suffer enough at the hands of humans, and this matter is avoidable»

    Uta H. · 25.10.2026

  • «Animal welfare instead of animal suffering»

    Frick A. · 25.10.2026

  • «because pasture nets are traps that not only kill animals but also torment them massively beforehand!»

    Martin R. · 25.10.2026

Read more (48)
  • «Our behaviour is thoughtless and cruel, the suffering of the animals terrible. Please sign this well-researched petition. Thank you!»

    Christine R. · 25.10.2026

  • «Ban the sale of orange-red fences to prevent animal suffering.»

    Sabine V. · 25.10.2026

  • «The suffering of the animals is indescribably great. Absolute animal cruelty.»

    Irmgard I. · 25.10.2026

  • «Because every single life deserves protection! It is also unacceptable for farmers to lament every single dead sheep for the cameras while evidently seeing no need to protect wild animals.»

    Jacqueline H. · 25.10.2026

  • «No animal deserves to suffer!!!»

    Regina H. · 25.10.2026

  • «Fencing shouldn\'t bring about cruelty, pain and suffering. Remove the offending fences and care for wild animals.»

    Judith R. · 25.10.2026

  • «Humanity is becoming ever less intelligent. Something like this should be banned!»

    Marcus Z. · 25.10.2026

  • «EVERY SINGLE ANIMAL LIFE COUNTS!»

    Barbara S. · 25.10.2026

  • «💔»

    Peter G. · 25.10.2026

  • «Each animal only has one life and we must protect it from suffering, not add to it.»

    Michaela F. · 25.10.2026

  • «The animal suffering must finally stop. The animals have no chance of getting out of there alive!»

    Verena B. · 25.10.2026

  • «Because I love animals and because they urgently need my protection!»

    Francesca Fiona P. · 25.10.2026

  • «I am signing because it is not only the nets that need to be removed. The pastures, too, must be open to wild animals. Their habitat is being ever more fragmented and reduced. That is unacceptable!»

    Sabina T. · 25.10.2026

  • «Someone needs to look after wild animals. It is all about profit now, only a few people use their brains, and animal suffering keeps growing! BB»

    Beatrice B. · 25.10.2026

  • «Because all living beings count. Because personal responsibility evidently isn’t enough here either.»

    Christine W. · 25.10.2026

  • «All animals are important, especially wild animals.»

    Helmut S. · 25.10.2026

  • «Unfortunately I have already seen many such fence victims myself, and something absolutely has to change.»

    Eva-Maria V. · 25.10.2026

  • «We in Germany are also fighting against the immense killing of wild species! It is irresponsible of the authorities to endorse such sacrilege or even to tolerate it at all!!! If we humans carry on like this, we will find that we have gradually destroyed our own foundations of life and brought the planet Earth, once so teeming with biodiversity, to the brink of the abyss!!!»

    Mike H. · 25.10.2026

  • «It\'s necessary to stop to inflict pain, suffering and death to the wildlife!!»

    Sara P. · 25.10.2026

  • «Initiatives like these raise public awareness. When we talk about climate change, we must start where we can make a difference... animals are our fellow inhabitants on this Earth, and a major part of a highly complex ecosystem of which we too are a part. Without an intact system, our basis for life and food, intact nature, will disappear.... Only then will we realise that we cannot eat AI....»

    Harry Z. · 25.10.2026

  • «A great many hedgehogs also die agonising deaths in pasture nets. These nets are put up in an utterly irresponsible way, are not checked and are simply left lying around. It is wild animals who pay for this treatment with their lives.»

    Barbara T. · 24.10.2026

  • «It is scandalous that legislation still does not completely ban such horrific torture traps for wild animals, which at the same time offer no effective protection for the fenced-in livestock. I am signing here so that this is finally put into practice.»

    Hans H. · 24.10.2026

  • «It is so cruel of livestock owners to think they are protecting their animals with such fences, while in fact setting up dangerous traps for all wild animals. If one knows how dangerous something can be, generally speaking, then one should either not use it at all or only use it in a less dangerous way. I am speaking out here in favour of an absolute ban on their use.»

    Regine B. · 24.10.2026

  • «I am signing this petition because grazing animals must be protected by sturdy fencing and not by these nets, which are nothing but terrible, life-threatening traps for wild animals.»

    Christine B. · 24.10.2026

  • «These terrible, cruel death traps must be removed»

    Petra S. · 24.10.2026

  • «because wild animals need our support»

    Isabelle r. · 24.10.2026

  • «Wild animals must be protected. It is bad enough that there are still recreational hunters.»

    Ruth B. · 24.10.2026

  • «Di»

    Mario W. · 24.10.2026

  • «These deaths must not happen. Under no circumstances. Those who put up these dangerous nets, and politicians, bear the responsibility!!»

    Eveline W. · 24.10.2026

  • «BAN this barbaric cruelty to animals too!!!»

    Monika S. · 24.10.2026

  • «because we must protect animals much better in general!!!»

    Christine Z. · 24.10.2026

  • «A change of thinking is needed before our fellow creatures are wiped out...»

    Nicole E. · 23.10.2026

  • «I absolutely do not want even more animals to die so cruelly!»

    Heike L. · 22.10.2026

  • «Animal welfare is a matter close to my heart.»

    Christian S. · 22.10.2026

  • «Responsible care, both in front of and behind the fence!!»

    Heike S. · 22.10.2026

  • «Animal suffering must not be.»

    Sonja G. · 22.10.2026

  • «I am signing because I have had to free animals from pasture nets myself.»

    Renate K. · 20.10.2026

  • «Because this animal suffering is unnecessary.»

    Pascale E. · 19.10.2026

  • «Because I find it a disgrace how animals are treated, and now this business with the fences on top of it. It is truly unbelievable what is going on.»

    Jacqueline S. · 19.10.2026

  • «Because this simply must not happen. The thoughtless, man-made suffering has to stop.»

    Andrea B. · 19.10.2026

  • «Because once again humans are to blame when animals are in danger of death!»

    Nicole B. · 19.10.2026

  • «This must not happen. We have already rescued lambs only 3 days old from such fences!»

    Ursula K. · 18.10.2026

  • «I am signing because the unimaginable torment of animals in the past must come to an end, or at least be reduced to a minimum.»

    Nash D. · 18.10.2026

  • «I keep goats and I get annoyed when pasture nets in the neighbourhood are repeatedly left standing unused or half dismantled.»

    Thomas R. · 18.10.2026

  • «Because I want to stand up for animal welfare, and I disagree in many respects with leaving such fences standing out of sheer convenience.»

    Cornelia W. · 18.10.2026

  • «Wild animals must be protected!»

    Thorsten M. · 18.10.2026

  • «Because I am for all wild animals, and they have a right to live. They must not be shot by the hunting pack, nor get caught in nets. What people do to them is dreadful. When will it finally be permitted to hunt such people? I'd be there straight away!»

    Verena A. · 18.10.2026

  • «The thoughtless and reckless behaviour of humans towards nature and its living creatures must stop. Nature belongs to the animals and not to us. We should only be visitors.»

    Anja v. · 18.10.2026

News

  • 28 minutes ago 250 signatures reached
  • 1 day ago 100 signatures reached
  • 5 days ago 50 signatures reached
  • 7 days ago 25 signatures reached
  • 7 days ago 10 signatures reached