Dehorning leads to chronic pain in calves
A study by the Vetsuisse Faculty of the University of Bern investigated the development of acute and chronic pain following dehorning in calves. The study, which had already attracted attention and has now been published, shows that despite optimal anaesthesia and pain management, both acute and chronic pain and hypersensitivity can develop in calves. Dehorning
A study by the Vetsuisse Faculty of the University of Bern investigated the development of acute and chronic pain following dehorning in calves.
The now-published study shows that despite optimal anaesthesia and pain management, both acute and chronic pain and hypersensitivity can develop in calves.
Dehorning is an invasive procedure applied worldwide to newborn calves up to eight weeks of age. The horn buds are cauterised using a so-called thermocautery device. In humans, such wounds can cause long-term sensory deficits and chronic pain.
«Several studies have already shown that dehorning triggers behavioural and hormonal changes in calves that indicate acute pain,» explains study lead Claudia Spadavecchia.
The Methodology
The study was conducted on 34 male calves. On the day of dehorning, all calves were sedated and analgesics were administered both locally and systemically. Only a portion of the calves were actually dehorned; the remainder underwent sham dehorning in order to distinguish the effect of dehorning itself from the handling and pain treatment.
Chronic hypersensitivity in 38% of dehorned calves
38% of the dehorned calves developed chronic trigeminal hypersensitivity. Pain scores were significantly higher in the dehorned calves compared to the sham-dehorned calves throughout the entire study period up to the age of 105 days.
«We conclude from this that the consequences of dehorning can extend far beyond the acute phase. Individual animals may be affected by chronic trigeminal pain regardless of age and pain management», says Spadavecchia. More on animal rights.
More on the subject of recreational hunting: What the research says about this is shown by Hunting fact-checked: the state of research.
The position of IG Wild beim Wild: IG Wild beim Wild rejects recreational hunting. Our model is the canton of Geneva, which has managed without recreational hunting since 1974: without hunting seasons, without hunting dogs, without driven hunts, without high seats, without the animal cruelty and crime that go hand in hand with hunting season elsewhere. What has worked there for over fifty years disproves every position paper by JagdSchweiz. An association that bases its policy on claims it refutes in its own documents is not a professional organisation, but a factory for misinformation.
