16 June 2026, 08:37

Search

Hunting

Mass deception in series: St. Gallen swears in 65 new hobby hunters

In the canton of St. Gallen, hobby hunters train, examine and supervise hobby hunters themselves.

Wild beim Wild editorial team — 16 June 2026

On 12 June 2026, in the canton of St. Gallen, 65 aspiring hobby hunters passed the hunting examination, around 80 per cent of the candidates.

At the handover of the certificates of competence, the cantonal hunting administration emphasised the “important responsibility” of the hunting trade and spoke of a “modern and responsible approach to hunting”.

It is the continuation of a story that we already documented last year under the title Mass deception in the canton of St. Gallen. Only the number has changed.

A closed system

In the canton of St. Gallen, hobby hunters are trained, examined and supervised by hobby hunters. The examination commission, the training commission and the hunting division within the Office for Nature, Hunting and Fisheries are staffed by people who are themselves connected to hobby hunting. There is no independent professional or ethical oversight from outside.

In this way, an interest group examines and legitimises its own leisure pursuit. In hardly any other field involving the lives of sentient animals would such self-monitoring be conceivable.

Not an isolated case, but a system

St. Gallen does not stand alone. The same staging is repeated year after year across the cantons, as our series shows: In Solothurn the Landammann hands over the certificates with praise for “healthy wildlife populations and efficient regulation”, in Zug the canton promises “animal-welfare-compliant and safe” hunting, in Lucerne, Baselland and in the Aargau the same pattern. They are the same platitudes, the same self-legitimisation. What sounds like a professional appreciation is a cross-cantonal template text.

A training that protects nothing

The deficiencies begin with the training itself. The courses for the hunting examination are predominantly conducted by people from the hunting milieu, some with a pronounced ideological background, and require no regular proof of qualification. Anyone who passes the examination then moves within the echo chamber of the hunting press, which constantly repeats distorted and often false portrayals. In the hunting clubs, they confirm one another.

This does not produce professional qualification, but rather a sealed-off group that is barely receptive to new information. What is fatal is that the local press and politicians continue to believe that expertise lies ready beneath the hunter's hat, and on nature topics turn of all people to the local hobby hunter.

What «responsibility» means in practice

The reality of this much-invoked responsibility can be read off the fox and the badger. In the canton of St. Gallen, thousands of mostly healthy foxes and badgers are killed year after year, without any wildlife-biological or ecological reason. The animals are not killed for food but end up at the carcass collection point.

The science here is unequivocal: lightly hunted fox populations produce fewer offspring, while intensive hunting even counteracts this through compensatory reproduction. What is sold as wildlife management is to a large extent killing without consequence. We have documented this in the article St. Gallen: Stop the fox and badger massacre .

An authority headed by a man who hunts wolves in Russia and shoots squirrels for fun, and in which hobby hunters train, examine and monitor one another, is not a nature conservation office. It is a hunting authority with a nature conservation label. This is not normal. That an ethically and scientifically unjustifiable leisure activity administers and legitimises itself in this way ought to be fundamentally reviewed politically and socially.

An authority with a credibility problem

The problem reaches right to the top. Office head Dr. Dominik Thiel, responsible for the canton's hunting and wolf policy, travelled in 2024 during working hours and at the taxpayers' expense to a multi-day wolf hunt in Russia and shot a squirrel for fun while sighting in his rifle. Two years after the scandal, he is still in office. The chronology can be found in the article Dominik Thiel: wolf hunter at the state's expense. lso head of the hunting division Simon Meier, who gave a welcoming address at the certificate ceremony, is no stranger either, as How the hobby hunter Simon Meier leads people onto the wrong trail shows.

It can be done differently

A counter-model is close at hand. The canton of Geneva completely banned hobby hunting in 1974 by popular vote. Since then, twelve state-employed professional hunters have taken over wildlife management, with an instant-kill rate of 99.5 per cent. Foxes, martens and badgers are not killed simply because it is hunting season. Instead, the focus is on deterrence and education. The result: the highest brown hare density in Switzerland and over 50 years without legal challenge. The claim that without hobby hunting the ecological balance would collapse is thus empirically refuted.

Dossier on the St. Gallen hunting administration

More on the topic of hobby hunting: In our dossier on hunting we bring together fact checks, analyses and background reports.

LET'S STAY IN TOUCH!

We would like to send you the latest news and offers in our newsletter.

Support our work

With your donation you help to protect animals and give their voice a hearing.

Donate now