Trophy Hunting: Myth and Reality
More and more European countries are banning the import of hunting trophies from certain protected species, such as Belgium, Finland, the Netherlands and France.
In the United Kingdom, a corresponding draft law has now cleared an important hurdle in the House of Commons, and a tightening of import rules is also currently being discussed at EU level. Animal and species conservation organisations welcome this development.
"For good reason, more and more countries are banning the import of hunting trophies. It harms wildlife populations, fosters corruption, cements colonial structures and is incompatible with the ethical values of our society. A large majority in Europe, but also many people from African countries, reject trophy hunting."
Dr. Mona Schweizer of Pro Wildlife.
Yet at the same time, hunting advocates are attempting to prevent import bans by portraying them as inadmissible and trophy hunting as a contribution to species conservation and poverty reduction.
Using the same arguments, government representatives from Namibia and Botswana are currently attempting to influence legislation in Berlin, London and Paris. Pro Wildlife has set facts against frequently voiced myths about trophy hunting.
Endangerment of threatened species
Trophy hunting is not about "wildlife management", population control or maintaining healthy animal populations. On the contrary, trophy hunters engage in unnatural selection, as they target particularly outstanding animals of frequently threatened species that are especially important for the survival of a population. Scientists and conservationists are thus currently condemning the shooting of three of the last great elephant bulls with particularly impressive tusks (“Big Tuskers”) in Tanzania.
The deliberate hobby hunting of “Big Tuskers” in Botswana had already drawn worldwide criticism. This is because older elephant bulls with large tusks have the best reproductive prospects and play a decisive role in social structures.
Studies document that trophy hunting decimates wildlife populations, reduces reproduction rates, shifts age and sex ratios, and disrupts social structures.
Profit for hunting tour operators and private hunting farms
Numerous reports confirm that money from big-game hunting ends up primarily in the pockets of hunting tour operators, large landowners, and local elites rather than with local communities. In Namibia, for example, 97% of hobby hunting takes place on private farms and only 3% in communal hunting areas. Where revenues from trophy hunting are redistributed at all, they are extremely small.
In Botswana, media reports criticise wealthy entrepreneurs for enriching themselves through trophy hunting at the expense of the rural population. Both in terms of generating revenue and jobs, trophy hunting is economically insignificant compared to photo tourism.
Trophy hunting does not resolve conflicts
To justify the killing of big cats or elephants, conflicts with humans are frequently cited. “There are many proven measures for defusing conflicts between humans and wildlife:Livestock protection, deterrence, diversification of income sources, and efficient land-use planning are among them. Corrupt trophy hunting, by contrast, tends to exacerbate conflicts rather than resolve them, because key individuals with important roles in social structures are killed,” says Dr. Mona Schweizer.
Background information:
- Facts on trophy hunting: 14 myths of trophy hunters debunked (January 2024)
- Trophy hunting of endangered species
- Alliance of 180 organisations calls for import ban on hunting trophies
HOBBY HUNTER RADAR
On the trail of hidden animal welfare offences, poaching and/or criminal activity? Report suspected cases to us! Help with the big Hobby Hunter Radar.
