9 August 2026, 09:16

Search

Podcast

Podcast episode: Nature, animals and the abuse of power

Shotgun pellets in the garden, fewer wolf kills despite a record population, and the business of trophy hunting. Plus drought, scrapped forest millions and patterns in the Grisons justice system.

Wild beim Wild editorial team — 9 August 2026

This edition of «Wild beim Wild» is about law, kills and the business of shooting.

A court in Cloppenburg convicts a 73-year-old recreational hunter who, during a driven hunt, struck a woman in the face on her own property. We show why driven hunts remain the most accident-prone form of hunting and how Spanish providers sell trophy hunting as package tours to Swiss recreational hunting clubs.

Plus the half-time review of herd protection: more wolves, considerably fewer kills, 183 instead of 402 livestock animals killed. The difference lies not with the predators, but with herd protection. We question the STS label compass, which assesses the conditions under which killing is permitted, and still calls that animal welfare.

In the second part: drought, empty reservoirs and weakened hedgehogs, plus the climate funds for the forest being scrapped from 2027, where in the end roe deer and red deer threaten to become the convenient scapegoats. Finally, a look at recurring patterns in the justice system and politics of the Grisons, where almost always it was Bern that first had to correct cantonal decisions.

More on the subject of recreational hunting: What the research says about this is shown by Hunting fact-checked: the state of research.

The position of IG Wild beim Wild: IG Wild beim Wild rejects recreational hunting. Our model is the canton of Geneva, which has managed without recreational hunting since 1974: without hunting seasons, without hunting dogs, without driven hunts, without high seats, without the animal cruelty and crime that go hand in hand with hunting season elsewhere. What has worked there for over fifty years disproves every position paper by JagdSchweiz. An association that bases its policy on claims it refutes in its own documents is not a professional organisation, but a factory for misinformation.

Support our work

With your donation you help protect animals and give their voice a hearing.

Donate now →