In Switzerland, game meat is often advertised as "authentic," "regional," and "animal-friendly." This sounds premium, organic, and ethically sourced. The reality is more sobering: around two-thirds of the game meat consumed in Switzerland is imported – primarily from Austria, Slovenia, Germany, and New Zealand. Statistically, the majority of what is sold as "Swiss game" does not come from Swiss forests. According to current industry data, the domestic share is a mere 38.4 percent – and a significant portion of that comes from game reserves, not from recreational hunting.
Furthermore, wild game is not a standardized, consistently controlled product like slaughtered meat. It originates from a chain that is difficult to control – shooting, tracking, retrieving, gutting, transport, refrigeration, and butchering. The risks lie precisely in this chain: lead from hunting ammunition, parasites, germs, inconsistent hygiene, and a cold chain that depends on weather, terrain, experience, and time constraints. Authorities warn of the risks. Studies confirm them. The lobby is keeping quiet about them.
This dossier reveals what consumers rarely hear but should know. It's not directed against people who eat game – it's against romanticizing nature as a substitute for consumer protection. You can find more background information on recreational hunting in our dossier on hunting .
What awaits you here
- What game meat really is – and where it comes from: Why “regional” is not a health label, what the structural difference between slaughtered meat and game meat means, and why two-thirds of Swiss game meat consumption comes from abroad.
- The core issue: Lead in game meat: What BLV, BfR and EFSA say about lead ammunition and game meat, which population groups are particularly at risk and why the problem is systemic and cannot be solved by "clean cooking".
- The processing chain: Where risks arise: What happens after the shot, why field work, recovery, cooling and butchering have a greater impact on food safety than with slaughtered meat, and which factors are particularly critical.
- Parasites and germs: Wild game is not automatically clean: What trichinellosis means in wild boars, what legal control obligations exist, and why they have gaps in practice.
- “Organic game” is a marketing myth: Why organic does not mean the same as controlled, and what the lack of certification specifically means for consumers.
- Animal welfare: Why "living freely" doesn't solve the problem: What misfires, stress, tracking and orphaned young animals mean for the argument "better than factory farming".
- Hunting method and meat quality: Why driven hunts and battues measurably influence meat quality, what stress hormones mean in muscle meat, and how the point of impact determines the hygiene of processing.
- Canada as a comparison: Why game from recreational hunting cannot be sold in large parts of Canada – and what that says about consumer protection standards.
- What consumers should ask: The crucial questions before buying or consuming wild game.
- What needs to change: Concrete political demands.
- Argumentation: Answers to the most common justifications of the game meat lobby.
- Quick links: All relevant articles, studies and dossiers.
What game meat really is – and where it comes from
"Wild game" refers to meat from wild animals: roe deer, red deer, chamois, wild boar, hare, and wild birds. The crucial difference between this and slaughtered meat is that the animal is not killed in a standardized, state-controlled slaughterhouse. It is hunted outdoors – under real-world conditions that vary considerably. Weather, time constraints, experience, equipment, and terrain all determine how quickly and cleanly the processing takes place.
This has direct consequences for consumer protection and food safety. With slaughtered meat, killing, initial processing, hygiene, refrigeration, and documentation are standardized and controlled. With game, the variation in each of these aspects is greater. This isn't scaremongering – it's the structural reality of a food product whose production chain begins in the forest and whose quality depends on the decision of a single recreational hunter on a single evening.
Furthermore, those who buy "Swiss game" are usually not buying from Swiss forests. Around two-thirds of the game meat consumed in Switzerland is imported – according to current industry data from the Swiss agricultural publication: the main suppliers are Austria, Germany, Slovenia, and New Zealand. The domestic share was around 38.4 percent in 2022/2023 – a record high after years of increases, demonstrating how dominant imports remain. Swiss game is a rare commodity, marketed as "regional" in seasonal advertising – but it doesn't fill the shelves of retailers. "Regional" is not a hygiene or health label. It's a marketing promise.
Read more: Hunting in Switzerland: Numbers, systems and the end of a narrative and Hunting myths: 12 claims you should critically examine
Lead in game meat: The officially recognized problem
The Federal Office for Food Safety and Veterinary Affairs (BLV) clearly recommends that children up to the age of seven, pregnant women, breastfeeding mothers, and women planning a pregnancy should avoid eating game killed with lead ammunition. This is not a recommendation from an organization critical of hunting. It is an official recommendation based on measurable findings.
The German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) shares this assessment and supports it with studies showing that lead bullets can fragment, particles can remain in the meat, and some of these fragments are invisible. A PLOS ONE study concludes that people can demonstrably ingest lead from fragments when consuming game killed with lead ammunition – with a measurable impact on blood lead levels, especially in frequent consumers, children, and pregnant women. In a comprehensive 2025 report on lead exposure in the European population, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) confirmed game meat as a relevant source of exposure, particularly for recreational hunting families. Lead is toxic to the human body in any quantity: it damages blood cell production, the liver, kidneys, and the central nervous system, with proven effects on brain development in children.
The core problem is systemic: it arises from hunting techniques, not from faulty cooking. Lead bullets fragment upon impact. Particles disperse in the meat in a radius around the wound channel that is not fully visible to the naked eye. Generously trimming the area around the bullet wound reduces the contamination – but does not eliminate it. Furthermore, Switzerland has only introduced a federal ban on lead ammunition of 6 mm caliber and larger from January 1, 2030. In the canton of Bern, the ban is already in effect from August 1, 2027. Until then, lead ammunition is legal for recreational hunting throughout Switzerland – and the risk to consumers is real.
More on this topic: Lead ammunition and environmental toxins from recreational hunting and lead residues in game meat products
The processing chain: Where risks arise
After death, autolysis begins: the body's own enzymes break down tissue. At the same time, germs multiply. The warmer it is and the longer it takes for the animal to be properly cared for and cooled, the more intense these processes become. For slaughtered meat, this period is limited to minutes and takes place under controlled conditions. For wild game, it often lasts for hours – outdoors, at varying temperatures, and with varying hygiene conditions.
Typical risk factors in hunting practice: Retrieving game in rough terrain takes longer than planned. Contact with flies, dirt, fur, soil, and equipment increases the risk of contamination. In cases of abdominal wounds, intestinal contents can leak – in such cases, the speed and care taken during gutting determine bacterial load and edibility. Gastrointestinal wounds, late retrieval, warm autumn weather, improper gutting, and transport without a functioning cold chain are not rare exceptions – they are typical risk factors in hunting practice that regularly occur in the everyday reality of recreational hunting without fixed standards. A study in the journal Meat Science examined surface bacterial counts on game carcasses after field processing and found considerable variance – depending on gutting hygiene, weather conditions, and the experience of the recreational hunter.
What this means for consumers: Food safety for wild game depends more on individual practices than with standardized slaughter. This is structurally unavoidable – as long as the processing chain begins in the forest and operates without uniform, independently monitored standards.
More on this topic: Game meat from hunters is carrion , and beware: Warning about game meat from hobby hunters
Parasites and germs: Wild game is not automatically clean
The risk of trichinella infection is particularly significant in wild boar. Trichinella is a roundworm that infests muscle tissue and can cause serious illness in humans. The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) documents cases of trichinellosis in Europe annually – with wild boar meat being the most frequent source of infection.
In Switzerland, all hunted wild boar intended for sale must be tested for trichinella according to the Animal Disease Ordinance and the Ordinance on Foodstuffs and Consumer Goods. The only exception is game meat intended exclusively for personal consumption and not for sale. This means that anyone receiving wild boar meat as a "gift" from a hobby hunter – without a trichinella test – is eating untested meat. This practice is widespread in Switzerland and difficult to control. Furthermore, it is generally true for game meat that STEC bacteria (Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli) are detectable. Food Standards Scotland investigated the risk of STEC contamination in game meat in 2020 and classified it as relevant, especially in cases of inadequate hygiene during the butchering process.
More on this: Game meat makes you sick , and according to studies, there are health risks associated with consuming game meat.
"Organic game" is a marketing myth
"Organic" means defined standards, documented farm inspections, and certified supply chains. Wild game, by definition, does not meet any of these requirements. The animal lived freely: that's true. But a free life is not a quality certificate. Lebensmittelklarheit.de states unequivocally: "Meat from wild animals is not organic wild game." An animal that lives in the forest also absorbs pollutants there – through soil, water, and food plants contaminated with pesticides, heavy metals, and other environmental contaminants. Wild boars accumulate pollutants particularly because they feed close to the ground and are omnivorous.
"Regional" is also not a term that defines food quality. It describes origin – not hygiene, not contamination, not processing quality. Equating "regional" with "safe" and "healthy" is a rhetorical shift that serves marketing interests, not consumer protection. Anyone who wants to communicate responsibly about game meat talks about verifiable criteria: type of ammunition, refrigeration time, hygiene documentation, trichinella testing, and contamination. The recreational hunting lobby structurally fails to do this.
More on this topic: Wild game cannot be organic and media and hunting issues: How language, images and "experts" shape the debate
Animal welfare: Why "living free" doesn't solve the problem
The strongest argument of the wild game lobby is: "Better than factory farming." This comparison shifts the moral question, but doesn't resolve it. Because even with wild game, the following applies: death is not automatically instantaneous and not automatically painless.
Missed shots – hits that don't kill instantly – are structurally unavoidable. There are no reliable Swiss statistics on how many animals are shot without being found. What does exist are estimates from practical experience and the fact that blood tracking – the search for wounded game with tracking dogs – is an integral part of the Swiss hunting system because it is regularly required. Wild animals may die after minutes or hours in pain and stress – in the forest, alone, without human presence. Measurable stress hormones in the meat of killed animals prove that this dying process is anything but physiologically neutral. Killing doesn't become "humane" simply because it happens in the forest. It merely becomes more unpredictable.
More on this topic: Wild animals, mortal fear and lack of stunning: Why animal welfare law ends at the forest edge and hunting and animal welfare: What practice means for wild animals
Hunting method and meat quality: What research shows
The hunting method is not a minor detail – it is a crucial factor in meat quality. Research on quality parameters in harvested game shows measurable differences depending on the hunting method.
During driven hunts – beaters, battues – wild animals are subjected to considerable stress before the shot: flight, pressure from dogs, and prolonged movement. Stress affects muscle metabolism: the pH value in the meat drops differently, water retention capacity changes, and oxidation processes accelerate. This has measurable effects on tenderness, shelf life, and hygiene risk. A study on surface bacterial counts on game carcasses after field processing confirms that shot location and contamination patterns are directly linked – abdominal shots significantly increase the risk of bacterial contamination from intestinal contents.
The time between the shot and death is not only an animal welfare issue, but also a quality factor. Studies show a correlation between a prolonged dying period and elevated stress hormone levels in the tissue. This means that game meat from driven hunts statistically has a higher probability of lower meat quality parameters than game from quiet, stand-and-wait hunts. Those who sell game meat should communicate this transparently, but as a rule, they do not.
More on this topic: Driven hunting in Switzerland and the psychology of hunting
Canada as a comparison: Why hobby hunters are often not allowed to sell their game
In many Canadian provinces, the commercial sale of game meat from recreational hunting is severely restricted or prohibited. In Ontario, wild game may not be sold or served in restaurants under any circumstances – which explains why "game" on Canadian menus often actually means farmed game.
The reasoning is clear: Wild game from recreational hunting does not structurally meet the requirements for control, traceability, and government inspection. Uninspected, non-standardized meat is considered too risky for public sale. Furthermore, there is the issue of poaching protection: If wild game were allowed to be sold commercially, it would create incentives for illegal harvesting. Canada has opted for strict controls – for both consumer protection and nature conservation reasons. Swiss consumers do not have this protection. In Switzerland, a recreational hunter may sell wild game directly to private individuals and, to a limited extent, to restaurants and retailers – with little transparency, minimal documentation, and no government inspection of the processing.
More on this topic: Hunting laws and enforcement: Why self-monitoring is not enough and Hunting ban in Switzerland: Possibilities, models and limitations
What consumers should ask
If you are offered or served game meat, these are the crucial questions:
- Ammunition: Lead-free or lead-containing ammunition? Without this information, the lead exposure cannot be assessed.
- Time until cooling: How long after the shot should the cooling process begin? More than two hours at temperatures above ten degrees is critical.
- Dismantling: Who performed the dismantling? Under what hygienic conditions? With what documentation?
- Animal species: Wild boar must be assessed differently than roe deer. Is trichinella testing verifiable?
- For whom: Children up to seven years old, pregnant women, breastfeeding women, women wishing to have children: Observe the BLV recommendation, especially in case of unknown ammunition type.
- Origin: Imported or from Swiss hobby hunting? From an enclosure or from the wild?
Anyone who doesn't get clear answers to these questions is buying an unknown, not a nature experience.
Read more: Game meat: Natural, healthy – or dangerous? and Dementia: How harmful is game meat?
What would need to change
- Mandatory declaration of ammunition type : Anyone selling or offering game meat in restaurants must declare whether the animal was killed with lead-free or lead-based ammunition. This information is vital for BLV risk groups – and is currently systematically lacking.
- An immediate ban on lead ammunition throughout Switzerland, not just in 2030 : The Canton of Bern has shown that 2027 is possible. Lead-free ammunition is available and has been tested. Postponing the ban until 2030 protects lobby interests, not consumers.
- Uniform hygiene documentation for wild game : Time of slaughter, conditions of recovery, cooling temperature and butchering standards must be documented uniformly and supplied with every transfer – analogous to the documentation for slaughtered meat.
- Expansion of the trichinella testing requirement : Wild boar meat from hobby hunting, which is given away as a "gift" or "direct sale", must be subject to trichinella testing without exception – even if it is not officially "placed on the market".
- Transparency regarding imported game meat : Game meat sold in Swiss retail and restaurants must clearly declare its country of origin, species, and farming method (enclosed or in the wild). Simply labeling it "game" without further information does not meet modern consumer protection standards.
- Independent quality controls of game meat : Random checks by state food inspectors for lead, pollutants and germs in game meat that is placed on the market must be institutionalized and published.
- Sample proposals: Sample texts for proposals critical of hunting and sample letter: Appeal for change in Switzerland
Argumentation
"Wild game is healthier than supermarket meat." The Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office (FSVO) explicitly recommends that certain population groups refrain from eating wild game. Lead residues were detected in the majority of wild game sausages tested. Stress hormones in the meat of hunted animals are measurably higher than in animals that died naturally. Wild game is not a natural remedy. It is an emotionally marketed food product with real, officially recognized risks.
"Wild game is sustainable." Two-thirds of the wild game consumed in Switzerland is imported – some of it from game farms in New Zealand. Sustainability requires transparency, traceability, and controlled production chains. This is structurally not the case in the wild game market.
"The animal lived freely – that's animal welfare." Freedom before the shot does not mean humane killing. Misfires, lengthy searches, stress-induced euthanasia, and orphaned young are structurally unavoidable aspects of recreational hunting. The argument "lived freely" shifts the focus of the animal welfare question; it doesn't answer it.
"Lead-free ammunition is not yet widely available." Lead-free calibers have been on the market for years. The Bern Hunting Association has already internally communicated the ban, which will take effect in 2027. The argument that lead-free ammunition is unavailable is technically outdated and serves to delay the process, not to protect consumers.
"Wild game is inspected here." In Switzerland, wild game from recreational hunting is not systematically tested for lead, pollutants, or pathogens before being sold. The trichinella test for wild boar is the only legally required minimum inspection. Everything else is at the discretion of the recreational hunter.
Quick links
Posts on Wild beim Wild:
- Wild game: Natural, healthy – or dangerous?
- Wild game from a hunter is carrion
- Wild game meat cannot be organic
- Lead residues in game meat products
- Hobby hunters poison birds of prey
- Game meat makes you sick
- Dementia: How harmful is game meat?
- Hunters also lie when selling meat
- Warning: Beware of wild game meat from amateur hunters
- Studies indicate that there are health risks associated with consuming wild game
Related dossiers:
- Introduction to Hunting Criticism
- Hunting myths: 12 claims you should critically examine
- Hunting in Switzerland: Numbers, systems and the end of a narrative
- Lead ammunition and environmental toxins from recreational hunting
- Driven hunt in Switzerland
- Wild animals, mortal fear and lack of anesthesia: Why animal welfare law ends at the edge of the forest
- Hunting and animal welfare: What the practice does to wild animals
- Hunting laws and control: Why self-monitoring is not enough
- How hunting associations influence politics and the public
- Alternatives to hunting: What really helps without killing animals
External sources:
- Swiss farmer: Two-thirds of game meat imported (2025)
- LID.ch: Most game comes from abroad
- BfR: Lead fragments in game meat – health risk for certain consumer groups
- EFSA 2025: Scientific report on dietary exposure to lead in the European population
- EFSA 2025: Health risks and bioavailability of metal residues from hunting ammunition
- ECDC: Trichinellosis – Annual Epidemiological Report 2022
- Food Standards Scotland: The risk of STEC contamination in wild venison (2020)
- Canton of Solothurn: Frequently asked questions about trichinellosis in wild boar (PDF)
- Bernerjagd.net: Lead-free ammunition – status and deadlines 2025/2027/2030
- Lebensmittelklarheit.de: Meat from wild animals is not organic game
- Pain et al. 2025: EU regulation – lead ammunition and human/environmental health (PMC)
- ECHA: Lead in shot, bullets and fishing weights
Our claim
Wild game is not a harmless natural product. It is an emotionally marketed food with real, officially recognized risks – lead, parasites, inconsistent hygiene, and a lack of transparency. The recreational hunting lobby sells a romanticized view of nature where consumer protection is needed. The Swiss Federal Food Safety and Veterinary Office (FSVO) warns of potential risks. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has documented lead exposure. Food Standards Scotland classifies STEC contamination as relevant. And two-thirds of the wild game consumed in Switzerland does not come from Swiss forests, but is imported – some of it from game farms in New Zealand.
IG Wild beim Wild documents this reality because consumers have a right to complete information. Not to romanticized hunting stories. Not to marketing promises. To facts. To official recommendations. To transparency about what ends up on their plate and under what conditions it got there.
More on the topic of hobby hunting: In our dossier on hunting, we compile fact checks, analyses and background reports.